april to be read list [not classics]

0 comments

Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? by Philip K. Dick
Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut
We, the Drowned by Carsten Jensen
The Prisoner of Heaven by Carlos Ruiz Zafón
The Shadow of the Wind by Carlos Ruiz Zafón
Time Traveler's Guide to Medieval England by Ian Mortimer

college night at the getty center

0 comments

So there was live music, scavenger hunts, and photo booths but of course I had to run straight to the art. Amidst the beautiful collections were some gorgeous works with a classical setting, and here are a few pics of my favorites. From left to right: Medusa by Vincenzo Gemito (1911), Minerva by Joseph Nollekens (1775), Perseus Confronting Phineus with the Head of Medusa by Sebastiano Ricci (1705-10).

And of course I had to stop at the gift shop. It was a tough choice between a history of classical Europe book and a beautiful copy of Fagle's translation of the Iliad, but I eventually settled for something not classics related (The Time Traveler's Guide to Medieval England: A Handbook for Visitors to the Fourteenth Century) and a poster of A Young Girl Defending Herself Against Eros by Bouguereau because it is actually a picture of me.


[photos by me]

book rec [not classics]

0 comments

book facts: written by Carlos Ruiz Zafón, translated from Spanish by Lucia Graves, second book in a series but first chronologically and serves as a prequel to The Shadow of the Wind
setting: turn of the 20th century Barcelona
main character: David Martín, 20-30 years old, unreliable narrator

to read if you like:
  • mystery/murder mystery/crime fiction
  • noir fiction
  • absolutely beautiful diction (a kind of The Book Thief-esque almost poetic prose style)
  • books about writing/authors
  • books about the supernatural
  • religion, angels, etc. with "dark" elements
  • unreliable narrators
  • books set in Spain/Europe

[photo by me taken at Espresso Profeta coffee shop in Westwood, from my instagram]


remember what happened to achilles!

0 comments

This is related to classics....sort of.

My father and I are children at heart, so we found ourselves in an otherwise empty theater on a Thursday night watching Mr. Peabody and Sherman. My dad had liked the cartoon when he was younger and I love movies about time travel and history, and I had heard they visited Troy so of course I had to go. And I wasn't disappointed.

While this is an animated movie with a few crude jokes and slapstick aimed towards smaller children, this definitely wasn't your average kid's movie. It's enjoyable for kids to watch, for sure, but a lot of the history and jokes are better received if you know your history or appreciate a good pun (Mr. Peabody is full of them, and good ones at that). The jokes in general are all really top notch, I found myself laughing during a lot of the movie. For instance, it's funny to see Sherman and Mr. Peabody running away from nameless French revolutionaries, it's even funnier when you realize it's actually Robespierre in his nice striped outfit. Even the slapstick was pretty tasteful and sparse.

And the filmmakers very obviously played on people's previous knowledge of history and even other movies. For example, while Agamemnon is giving a speech to the Achaians while hiding inside the Trojan Horse he says, "Don't just rush into things! Remember what happened to Achilles!" Now unless kids these days are still reading those Magic Tree House books and are keeping up with their greek historical mythology, they probably don't remember what happened to Achilles. There's even a hilarious (to me at least) 1960's Spartacus reference at the end: everybody is standing up to defend Mr. Peabody with cries of "If that's how dogs act then I'm a dog too!" "Me, too!" "Me, too!" and a very Kirk Douglas-y looking Spartacus shouts "I am Spartacus!". Little shout-outs like this are all throughout the film and I really appreciated them.

I went to see this movie with my dad because I heard it was a good father-child film and it was. I almost cried at parts, especially the flashback scene. But this movie wasn't just about a normal father son relationship, and as other reviewers of the film mentioned, this film could be seen as an allegory for gay adoption. Nobody seemed to be surprise that Mr. Peabody is a talking dog with a degree from Harvard and a Nobel Prize, but the main conflict comes from some people thinking that "dogs" shouldn't raise children because what if the "dog" raised the child to be like a "dog"? After all, this whole conflict arose after Sherman bit Penny during a fight, "proof" that Mr. Peabody was incompetent as a parent and "training" Sherman to be a dog. The fight started because Penny bullied Sherman for having a "dog" for a parent and saying "if your dad's a 'dog' then you're a 'dog' too". Need I continue? If you want to keep going along with that metaphor, then this movie ended very positive with all of the characters coming together at the end in support of Mr. Peabody's right (which he won in a court of law) to keep his adopted son.

I can't thing of a good segue into a conclusion, but yeah, this movie was so much fun to watch with my dad and I highly suggest everybody go see it if you like history, time travel, father-child movies, and puns.


book series rec [not classics]

0 comments

to read if you like:
  • adult wizards
  • magic, science, and various magical creatures (fae, river spirits, etc)
  • interesting, well developed characters
  • POC main characters
  • books that take place in London
  • police procedurals
  • witty and genuinely funny dialogue
  • surprise twist endings
  • in text pop culture references to other scifi and fantasy works

I just recently finished the newly released fourth book in the series, Broken Homes, and had to stand up and walk around for a bit after the ending. Was really not expecting what happened.

My brother laughed at me for explaining it this way, but while these books are about wizards and magic, they are definitely more 'books about cops who happen to be wizards' then 'books about wizard cops'. It's a clichéd description, but don't go into these books expecting them to be like aurors straight from Harry Potter or anything. The main character, Peter Grant, is very modern, technologically literate, well-versed in the fantasy genre (making for some funny dialogue and analogies), and takes an almost scientific approach to studying magic. The plot is more murder/crime mystery than anything, and is done very well. A lot of police terms are used but it never seems too complicated or unnecessary, and an explanation always follows for those of us who aren't familiar with all the acronyms and police procedures used in the UK. The author really knows what he's doing when it comes to building his own unique urban fantasy universe; Aaronovitch has written some episodes for Doctor Who in the past and it shows.

These are the kind of books that are hard to explain without reading them for yourself. The actual magic itself and the history behind it is a bit strange without the context of the novel and difficult to neatly sum up in a few lines. I tried explaining to a friend of mine when I had just finished the first novel of the series and he would not stop laughing when I tried explaining how this one spell (spoiler-ish) literally ripped open somebody's face. The character Thomas Nightingale explains the magic really well, though, so go read the book!

diogenes of sinope: a hero among men

0 comments

"And now a general assembly of the Greeks was held at the Isthmus, where a vote was passed to make an expedition against Persia with Alexander, and he was proclaimed their leader. Thereupon many statesmen and philosophers came to him with their congratulations, and he expected that Diogenes of Sinope also, who was tarrying in Corinth, would do likewise. But since that philosopher took not the slightest notice of Alexander, and continued to enjoy his leisure in the suburb Craneion, Alexander went in person to see him; and he found him lying in the sun. Diogenes raised himself up a little when he saw so many persons coming towards him, and fixed his eyes upon Alexander. And when that monarch addressed him with greetings, and asked if he wanted anything, 'Yes,' said Diogenes, 'stand a little out of my sun.'"


[Plutarch's Life of Alexander, 14]

ancient world and the cinema

0 comments
Also known as Classics 42 at UCLA. It's my tenth and last week of class so I thought I'd give you guys the list of films we watched in case you're ever in the mood for a toga epic. Leave a comment if you'd like a full review on any of these films beyond the rating I'll give below. And keep in mind, while I love to analyze and discuss films, I will love anything that entertains me even if it might not be the best reviewed or most accurate film ever made, so I've rated these films based on how much I enjoyed watching them. For example, Spartacus has interesting commentary on socialism and fantastic cinematography, but it's not necessarily the most fun movie to watch on a Saturday night. So again, if you'd like a more detailed review of the cinematic/social aspects of the film, leave a comment!

1. Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure: 3/5


2. Ben-Hur (1959): 5/5


3. Quo Vadis (1951): 3/5


4. Spartacus (1960): 3/5


5. Cleopatra (1963): 4/5


6. Life of Brian: 5/5


7. Fellini Satyricon: 1/5 (this movie is extremely polarizing; you either love it or hate it)


8. Gladiator: 5/5


9. Agora: 5/5


10. The Eagle: 4/5

Copyright © Aias, you inarticulate ox. - Blogger Theme by BloggerThemes